Prog[^2^]https: economicstudents.com rational minds irrational choices the power of behavioural economics

What Is Prospect Theory?

Prospect Theory is a cognitive theory in behavioral finance that describes how individuals make choices under risk, particularly when evaluating potential gains and losses. Developed by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, it challenges the traditional economic assumption of perfectly rational decision making by demonstrating that people systematically deviate from classical models like expected utility theory. Prospect theory posits that individuals assess outcomes relative to a subjective "reference point," rather than in terms of final wealth states, and exhibit different attitudes towards risk depending on whether they are in the domain of gains or losses. This leads to phenomena such as loss aversion, where the psychological impact of a loss is felt more intensely than the pleasure of an equivalent gain. The framework of prospect theory helps explain various cognitive biases observed in financial markets and everyday choices.

History and Origin

Prospect theory emerged in the late 1970s as a foundational critique of the prevailing rational choice models in economics. Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, both psychologists, observed systematic discrepancies between how people should make decisions according to economic theory and how they actually behave. Their seminal paper, "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk," published in Econometrica in 1979, laid the groundwork for this new understanding of human judgment⁷, ⁸. The theory proposed that individuals do not assign value to absolute wealth, but rather to changes in wealth (gains or losses) relative to a personal reference point. This groundbreaking work integrated psychological insights into economic science, demonstrating how psychological factors influence economic decisions under uncertainty⁶. For their profound contributions to the field of behavioral economics, Daniel Kahneman was awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2002.

Key Takeaways

Reference Dependence: Individuals evaluate outcomes as gains or losses relative to a subjective reference point, not in terms of final wealth.
Loss Aversion: The pain of a loss is psychologically more potent than the pleasure of an equivalent gain.
Diminishing Sensitivity: The marginal impact of gains and losses diminishes as their magnitude increases. For example, the difference between gaining $10 and $20 feels more significant than the difference between gaining $1,000 and $1,010.
Probability Weighting: People tend to overweight small probabilities and underweight large probabilities, leading to distorted perceptions of risk.
Framing Effects: The way choices are presented, or "framed," can significantly influence decision-making, even if the underlying options are identical.

Formula and Calculation

Prospect theory models human decision-making using two primary functions: a value function and a probability weighting function.

The value function, (v(x)), describes the subjective value an individual assigns to gains ((x > 0)) and losses ((x < 0)) relative to a reference point. It is typically S-shaped, concave for gains (indicating risk aversion for gains) and convex for losses (indicating risk-seeking behavior for losses), and steeper for losses than for gains, reflecting loss aversion.

A common form for the value function is:

v(x) = \begin{cases} x^\alpha & \text{if } x \ge 0 \\ -\lambda (-x)^\beta & \text{if } x < 0 \end{cases}

Where:

(x) = The outcome (gain or loss) relative to the reference point.
(\alpha) = A parameter representing diminishing sensitivity for gains (typically (0 < \alpha < 1)).
(\beta) = A parameter representing diminishing sensitivity for losses (typically (0 < \beta < 1)).
(\lambda) = The loss aversion coefficient (typically (\lambda > 1)), indicating that losses loom larger than gains.

The probability weighting function, (\pi(p)), transforms objective probabilities ((p)) into subjective "decision weights" ((\pi(p))). People tend to overweight low probabilities and underweight moderate to high probabilities.

A common form for the probability weighting function is:

\pi(p) = \frac{p^\gamma}{(p^\gamma + (1-p)^\gamma)^{1/\gamma}}

Where:

(p) = The objective probability of an outcome.
(\gamma) = A parameter reflecting the degree of probability distortion (typically (0 < \gamma < 1)).

The overall "utility" or "value" of a prospect (a risky choice with multiple outcomes) is then calculated as the sum of the weighted values of each outcome:

V = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \pi(p_i) v(x_i)

Where:

(V) = The overall value of the prospect.
(p_i) = The probability of outcome (i).
(x_i) = The value of outcome (i) (gain or loss).
(\pi(p_i)) = The decision weight for probability (p_i).
(v(x_i)) = The subjective value of outcome (x_i).

Interpreting Prospect Theory

Prospect theory offers a powerful lens through which to understand seemingly irrational economic behaviors. Its core insight is that people are not purely rational utility maximizers, but are instead influenced by the context and framing of choices, as well as their emotional responses to gains and losses. For instance, the concept of loss aversion suggests that investors might hold onto losing stocks for too long, hoping to avoid realizing a loss, while selling winning stocks too early to lock in a gain, even if this is not financially optimal⁵. This behavior, known as the disposition effect, directly contradicts traditional rational investment models.

Furthermore, the framing effect highlights how the presentation of information can sway decisions. For example, a medical procedure described with a "90% survival rate" might be chosen over one with a "10% mortality rate," even though they are statistically equivalent. In finance, this implies that the way an investment opportunity is communicated—emphasizing potential gains versus potential losses—can significantly impact an investor's willingness to take on risk. Understanding these elements of prospect theory allows for a more realistic assessment of market dynamics and individual investment decisions.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investor, Alex, who purchased a stock for $100 per share.

Scenario 1: Stock Price Rises
The stock price increases to $120. Alex has a choice:
A. Sell the stock now and realize a $20 gain per share.
B. Hold the stock, with a 50% chance it goes to $140 (+$40 total gain) and a 50% chance it goes back to $100 (+$0 total gain).

According to prospect theory, Alex, being risk-averse in the domain of gains, is likely to choose option A, locking in the sure $20 gain, even though the expected value of option B ($20 gain) is the same. The diminishing sensitivity to gains means that the psychological satisfaction from gaining an additional $20 (from $20 to $40) is less than the satisfaction from the initial $20 gain.

Scenario 2: Stock Price Falls
The stock price drops to $80. Alex has a choice:
C. Sell the stock now and realize a $20 loss per share.
D. Hold the stock, with a 50% chance it recovers to $100 (+$0 total loss) and a 50% chance it drops further to $60 (-$40 total loss).

In this scenario, Alex is in the domain of losses. Due to loss aversion and the convex value function for losses, Alex is likely to choose option D, seeking to avoid the certain $20 loss, even though the expected value of option D (-$20 loss) is the same. The pain of realizing the initial $20 loss is so strong that Alex is willing to take a significant risk (50% chance of a larger $40 loss) to potentially avoid any loss at all. This highlights how the subjective value of outcomes drives different risk preferences in gains versus losses.

Practical Applications

Prospect theory has numerous practical applications across various fields, especially in finance and economics. In investment decisions, it helps explain phenomena like the disposition effect, where investors are more willing to sell winning stocks than losing ones, often holding onto underperforming assets too long in hopes of recovery. Fi⁴nancial advisors can leverage insights from prospect theory to help clients understand their inherent cognitive biases, such as loss aversion, and make more rational choices.

I³n product design and marketing, companies use prospect theory principles to frame offers. For example, presenting a discount as a "gain" (e.g., "Save $50") is often more effective than framing it as avoiding a loss (e.g., "Don't lose out on $50 savings"). It also informs risk management strategies, such as setting stop-loss orders, which aim to mitigate the impact of loss aversion by pre-committing to a selling point to avoid larger potential losses. Policy makers also apply behavioral economics insights, including prospect theory, to encourage desired behaviors, such as increasing participation in retirement savings plans by making enrollment the default option.

#²# Limitations and Criticisms

While prospect theory revolutionized the understanding of decision making, it is not without its limitations and criticisms. One common critique is the difficulty in precisely determining an individual's reference point in real-world scenarios, as it can be influenced by various external factors and individual expectations. This subjectivity makes it challenging to apply the theory consistently and predict behavior with high accuracy across all contexts.

Some psychologists also argue that prospect theory, while descriptive, lacks deeper psychological explanations for the underlying cognitive processes it models. Fo¹r instance, it describes that people exhibit loss aversion, but may not fully explain why this psychological mechanism occurs beyond a mathematical representation. Critics also note that the theory primarily focuses on individual decision-making and may not fully account for social or group dynamics, where interactions and collective biases can significantly influence outcomes. Furthermore, some empirical studies suggest that the magnitude of loss aversion can vary depending on the context and the size of the stakes involved.

Prospect Theory vs. Expected Utility Theory

Prospect theory and expected utility theory represent two fundamentally different approaches to modeling human choice under uncertainty.

Feature	Expected Utility Theory	Prospect Theory
Core Assumption	Rational agents maximize expected utility based on final wealth states.	Agents evaluate outcomes as gains or losses relative to a reference point, influenced by psychological biases.
Value Assessment	Based on absolute wealth levels; utility function is typically concave (risk-averse).	Based on changes in wealth (gains/losses); value function is S-shaped (concave for gains, convex for losses) and steeper for losses.
Risk Preference	Generally consistent risk aversion across gains and losses.	Varies: Risk aversion for gains, risk-seeking behavior for losses (reflection effect).
Probability Treatment	Objective probabilities are used directly.	Probabilities are subjectively weighted (probability weighting), with small probabilities overweighted and large probabilities underweighted.
Descriptive vs. Normative	Primarily normative (how people should decide).	Primarily descriptive (how people actually decide).

The main point of confusion often arises because expected utility theory is prescriptive—it dictates how a rational agent should behave to maximize their total utility or satisfaction. In contrast, prospect theory is descriptive, explaining the observed, often irrational, ways in which humans actually make choices. While expected utility theory assumes a consistent preference for higher expected value, prospect theory acknowledges that human psychology, including emotions and cognitive shortcuts, leads to systematic deviations from this rational ideal.

FAQs

What is the primary difference between Prospect Theory and traditional economic theories?

The primary difference is that prospect theory acknowledges that human decision making is often irrational and influenced by psychological factors, whereas traditional economic theories like expected utility theory assume that people are rational actors who consistently make choices to maximize their utility. Prospect theory highlights biases such as loss aversion and the impact of framing on choices.

What is "loss aversion" in Prospect Theory?

Loss aversion is a core concept in prospect theory stating that the psychological pain or impact of a financial loss is significantly greater than the pleasure or satisfaction derived from an equivalent financial gain. For example, losing $100 feels worse than gaining $100 feels good. This often leads individuals to make choices that prioritize avoiding losses over achieving gains.

How does Prospect Theory apply to investing?

In investing, prospect theory helps explain why investors might behave in ways that seem irrational from a traditional economic perspective. For instance, it accounts for the "disposition effect," where investors tend to sell winning stocks too early and hold onto losing stocks for too long, driven by the desire to lock in gains and avoid realizing losses. Understanding this can help investors make more disciplined investment decisions and avoid common cognitive biases.

Can Prospect Theory help me make better financial decisions?

Yes, understanding prospect theory can help you identify and potentially mitigate your own cognitive biases when making financial decisions. By recognizing your tendency towards loss aversion, for example, you can develop strategies like pre-setting rules for buying and selling to reduce the emotional impact on your choices. It encourages a more disciplined approach to diversification and hedging by revealing how your perception of risk can be distorted.